We finally got some answers and, therefore, a sliver of closure. Make no mistake, the case is closed (as far as we're involved)... but I don't consider it total closure as our family will forever continue to pray for sweet Christian.
C was taken on Friday, the 22nd of February... you know the story... Like A Bandaid...
The very next day was Ethan's 3rd birthday party... the day after E's party our family went on vacation to Disney World. Every single day we were in the "happiest place on earth" I called El Dorado County hoping to find some answers.
If you can recall, when I got the call from our social worker telling us that she was coming to pick up C, she told me that she'd "explain when [she] got there"... and then she didn't. I'm having a hard time searching for words to describe this other than, she lied. Dishonest? Misleading? Well, they're all synonyms for "fib".
So I called... while waiting in line for a ride, at the hotel, pretty much in every theme park Walt Disney World has... trying to find someone who could tell me more than, "I can't tell you that."
I found 2 people that week who picked up the phone. One was a supervisor who told me that "it was an administrative decision that Pam be the only person to talk with me about this."
Okay! That's someone! I got her number on Tuesday, so I called and left a message Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, annnnd Friday. Her voicemail says she "will return calls within 24 hours" so I had to ask, was she out sick or avoiding me like the plague?
My guess? She had 1,000 other problems to deal with and fires to put out... that, and she didn't want none of this ;)... would you?
We got back from Florida close to midnight on Sunday... so on Monday, I tried calling again. This time, Pam picked up the phone. It's easier for me to describe what happened in dialogue format. It's not exactly word for word, but without recording our conversation, this is what happened:
A: "Hi Pam, this is Allie Young." Finding no need to further introduce myself due to of the 4 messages I left, "How are you today?"
P: "Fine."
... silence...
A: ".... good. I was hoping you could tell me more about what happened when "Christian" was taken from our home since our social worker couldn't."
P: "Didn't you take the PRIDE Classes?"
A: "Yes."
P: "Then I don't know why we're having this conversation."
... ooooh! That was a rhetorical question. PRIDE classes are required in order to get a foster parenting licence. This woman must be from Georgia because she is a peach!
A: "I was hoping you could tell me whether C was reunified with family - and I'm not asking specifics on who: Grandma, Distant Uncle, Family Friend.... - or if he was passed onto another foster family like us?"
P: "I can't tell you that."
Ignoring her answer...
A: "... because if he was reunified with family, that's closure for us! We fully expected him to go back to family and if he was taken at a seconds notice due to reunification, I get that! But if not, and he was moved to another Foster Family, I can't help but think we did something wrong..."
P: "Well, there were a few things that raised some red flags."
A: "Okay! Please tell me what we did wrong. This was our first placement and if we did something we shouldn't have, please tell me!"
P: "Well, you had a vacation planned and didn't tell us until after you got him. It's not that we don't ever want you to go on vacation, but you need to tell us these things if you know before placement. Second, we didn't know that you had a nanny. You are supposed to have her fingerprinted and you didn't. Third, you changed his name and you should never change a child's name unless you adopt them."
Alright, dialogue is over... before I tell you what I said, I was very cordial with her. My tone was calm and polite. I extended grace best I could, and in the end, I thanked her for taking the time to explain this to me. Had we not had this conversation, we would have repeated everything with the next placement because we flat out did not know! Thank goodness I called 50 times!
I told her that she was mistaken that we "did not tell anyone about our vacation" when we got C. When Mark and I went to pick him up... before we signed papers, before we met him... we said to the emergency social worker and her supervisor, "Just so you know, we are going on vacation to Disney World in 3 weeks. We'll be gone for a week. We'd like to take him with us if we can... either way, if this is going to be a problem, let us know." They're response? "Oh no, that shouldn't be a problem. We'll have to find out who to talk to about seeing if he can go too."
Not only did we give fair warning before officially signing and meeting the little guy, but every week we had him, I called to ask what the progress was on taking C with us on vacation.
I truly don't know how this was even an issue. I know I shouldn't assume, but if I were to guess, I'd say that the crossover in communication between our actual social worker (long term) and our emergency social workers (the ones you get immediately upon placement for the first week or two) is almost non-existent. So how would our actual social worker know we had given "fair warning" about the trip?
When I explained this, Pam said, "Well, you were given the option to take him and you decided not to."
To that I said, "True! That's absolutely correct. However, we took him to the Sacramento Zoo the week before our planned vacation and it was a nightmare. The 30 minute car ride from our house to the zoo, he cried himself to sleep because he couldn't handle being restrained in a carseat for that long. Imagine a plane ride from California to Florida. Then, once we got to the zoo, he was overstimulated. So overstimulated that he started to flail his body with no self-preservation... meaning, he would fling his body on the concrete ground. This was the Sacramento Zoo, not Disney World. We prayed really hard about this and didn't make the decision easily, but we decided it would be safer for him and best for everyone if we put him in respite while we were gone." She actually ended up agreeing with our decision... not that it mattered now. Because really, the last thing that poor boy needed was to jump off a boat ride or spend the week in the WDW Urgent Care.
---> Had we known that "IF you go on vacation and not take him THEN we will take him forever"... we would have canceled in a heart beat. However, we weren't given that warning.
Also, for the record (and I told them this!) we bought, wrapped, and packed him a present to open each day we were gone with a picture of us attached that read, "We love you, Christian. Mommy, Daddy, and Ethan will be back soon!" along with a family flip book of us so he wouldn't forget and could be reminded that we will come back! When he was picked up and taken away, our social worker encouraged us to still give him the gifts and family flip book saying it would be good for Christian and not traumatize him further. I can't help but think this probably worked against us as the social worker probably used it as proof that we called him Christian. In which case, our hearts would totally be overlooked and replaced by the final strike against us.
Second, about the nanny. We don't have a nanny... at least that's not what I'd call her. Cari is our babysitter/mommy's helper who comes once a week to watch Ethan or help around the house. Half the time I'm home just doing household chores that need to get done but couldn't do if I didn't have help. Sometimes I'm gone all day with appointments, sometimes I'm home all day. Most days, it's a toss up. When someone says Nanny, I think of in-home day care while I work full-time. That's not the case.
When taking the PRIDE classes, we learned of the "Prudent Parent Rule" which means that unless you are gone for 24 hours, if it's good enough for your kids, it's good enough for foster kids.
Ethan and Christian were inseparable. Everywhere E went, C went. We did not "throw C to the wolves" so to speak. We are very picky about who we let watch our kids. And this is where we got in trouble in the first place.
When we learned it would be best to put C in respite for our trip, I wasn't okay with leaving him with just any foster family. For better or worse we loved him like our own. If Mark and I were going out of town and leaving Ethan, I would leave E with a Grandma. That wasn't an option for C because they are not foster certified. So, I tried to see if a friend at church could take him for the week who is licensed. She was happy to do so, but since she is licensed in Sacramento County, I found out this wasn't possible. I don't know of anyone in El Dorado County (other than us) who are licensed. Cari, however, has a church body with several families who are licensed. Cari lives in El Dorado County!
Cari, who is also super picky about her children, said she would trust a couple of these foster certified families with her own kids... that was good enough to start inquiring for me!
So, I called these families and ran across one family who sounded absolutely perfect! They lived in Camino, had multiple children of their own (a good distraction for C!), a Christian family, the mother was very disciplined in her scheduling (consistency and boundaries were what C needed) as she home schooled her kids, and you could just tell her heart was in the right place.
I asked our social worker if C could stay with her/that family. I explained to her that she came highly recommended by our babysitter and we would love to meet with them before we drop him off for the week, so please let us know if it's okay.
Back to dialogue:
Social Worker: "Oh, you have a Nanny? Do they know this here at the county?"
Thinking this was off topic, but I answered the question any way...
A: "We don't have a Nanny. Cari is more of a mommy's helper/babysitter. I stay at home full-time but she comes once a week to help with the kids or with things around the house. Why? Is that a problem?"
SW: "Oh no. I just need to forward this information along."
I can't remember if this was the same day or next, but our social worker called us back and asked me a handful of questions and a reoccurring theme was about "our nanny".
SW: "I'm sorry if this sounds like an interrogation..."
A: "That's okay. But yeah, it kinda does. Are we doing something wrong? Is there a problem?"
SW: "Oh no. I just need to forward this information on."
Again... she was lying to us.
Apparently, the Prudent Parent Rule works only if it's every now and then and not on a regular basis. However, if we took him to a church or a gym's kid club/day care routinely, we wouldn't need to have any background checks. But having someone come in your house weekly, call her whatever you want - nanny, mother's helper, etc. - she needs a background check.
For the record. I went through our PRIDE book (thickness similar to a text book) and did not see ONE PAGE where it says this. There was mention that they hope you take time away, hire a babysitter, for time to yourself. There was no mention about finger printing. I was assured that it was discussed... and that we should have known this.
Again, had anyone told us (possibly our own social worker who we asked numerous times if anything we were doing was wrong...) that, IF you don't get your babysitter fingerprinted, THEN we will take him away forever.... we would have sent Cari to get fingerprinted the second we knew and paused her visits until she was cleared.
The third strike was in regards to calling him Christian. I can totally see how this was not appreciated and why they don't allow it. The IF, THEN statement applies here too. We would have immediately stopped calling him anything but his given name had we known the consequences... we just weren't given the warning.
Not that it matters anymore, but in case you are wondering why we switched his name (not legally, but why we called him Christian)... these are the reasons:
- The only dog Mark and I ever had together, was named his given name.
- Although there is no way of knowing for sure, it sounded like C was not going to be reunified with family. Our social worker DID tell us that in her experience, it "wasn't looking good" for C.
- We treated him like our own son. And if that's the case, if we were to have another son, we'd name him Christian.
- He was 2.5 years old, but like I mentioned before, emotionally 1.5 years old. Adoption at best can be completed in 18 months through the system... if we were going to adopt him (which it was looking promising... I still think he will need to be adopted...) we thought it best to start calling him by his new name (one better suited than our old dog's name) sooner than later. Better to start at 2.5 (or more like 1.5) than at 4 years old.
- It was a good alias for him in keeping his privacy and we thought, a good start to a new beginning.
Obviously, we were wrong!
Recently I was called into the County Office for an interview about what happened. I was thrilled to be asked our side of the story and to have my words put down on paper! I was starting to wonder about it all... starting to think, "If I didn't call, we wouldn't even know what we did was wrong! We would never be helpful to anyone!"
*************
We will forever pray for Christian. Praying that he is with a family who loves him like their own flesh and blood. Praying he is safe, healthy, at peace, feeling loved and comforted... he will forever be lifted in our hearts and prayers.
We are also really praying about what we should do next. I keep reliving James 1:27 over and over in my head (or motivation for fostering/adopting) and the part that sticks out to me is... "Religion that God our Father finds pure and faultless is this, to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world." It sticks out to me because even though our actions are what made them move him/traumatize him, it was the system - or part of the world - that knowingly decided to traumatize him again knowing what they knew. Once again, C was beat up by the world and his heart was once again polluted with injustice. He got the shortest end of the stick! And while I feel like we weren't treated respectfully as foster parents, accused wrongfully, lied to, etc, none of that matters because Christian lost again. And we were in it for him.
We're having a hard time with the secrecy of it all. We don't need to know all the details of his family history, names of his relatives, or where anybody lives... but please, please, tell us if we are doing something wrong so we can at least make a choice to correct it and give the child a fighting chance to continue to learn how to attach and bond and have a chance at healing and recovery. Or at the very least, if we are looking for guidance and answers to truth, please tell us right from wrong. Secrecy and darkness go hand in hand.
Such a dark world we live in!
So... to keep oneself from being polluted by the world... does that mean we press on through the darkness? Foster again and potentially continue to be part of it? Because really... we had a role in his trauma! We never thought once that we would contribute to anything but loving on foster kids... we're not sure we could do that again. We're not positive we're called to it again. Especially the way the system forces you to play along.
Sometimes I think, "What good did that do?" They were quietly tallying all the wrongs we did but they never once looked into our hearts and what we were giving to this boy. If they did, they wouldn't find anything but love and protection for Christian. Even if they asked us today if we wanted him back, we would say no (so long as he was with a loving, safe family). Just like the story in the Bible about the "two mothers" who claimed to have the same baby... King Solomon, in his wisdom, said that to make it fair, they should just split the baby in half so each mother could have half. One mom agreed it was fair while the other would rather give her baby away fully to a stranger so long as he wasn't harmed. By that response, the true identity of the mother was revealed (1 Kings 3:16-28).
In a similar way, I know that the more C is moved/traumatized, the more it rips him apart. I want him to be whole, healthy, and healed. But hey, at least those women were given a trial!... and their judge was just.